When the Star announced layoffs a few weeks ago, one of the causalities appeared to be the radio room. Here’s an update.

Journalists across Canada were stunned earlier this month to learn that the Star planned to kill its famed radio room program. The other layoff news — in advertising, the library, the editorial assistants, the page desk, the designers — was terrible enough. But for many in the industry, management’s plan to kill the newsroom’s radio room in particular made no economic or journalistic sense.

Your union has a special fondness for the radio room, because it was entirely the Guild’s idea to staff it with cheaper students, back in the late ‘90s. Your union said let’s give journalism students in town the chance to work as part-time temps in our radio room — the 24-hour, 7-day task of listening in to police, ambulance and fire department dispatchers, plus monitoring radio and TV newcasts. Experienced full-time journalists, meanwhile, would be freed to get out there and chase the bigger news — including the epic car crashes, murders and other big-city events flagged by the students in the radio room. It was win-win — efficiency for the paper, a first toe in the industry for the students.

We nicknamed it “Kids in the Box,” after the comedy troupe, Kids in the Hall. We created in bargaining a special editorial trainee wage category and pay rate. This was also used to launch our other big Guild student idea, the much larger editorial intern program, which allows the paper to hire a dozen rookie journalists for one year. Both radio room and intern programs were industry firsts and remain industry leaders. They are a critical element of our newsroom today. They also credit a creative, non-traditional union that thinks way outside the normal, if we say so ourselves.

This month’s company plan is to save money by killing the student radio room. It would contract out the work to its partly owned subsidiary at Canadian Press, PageMasters, to monitor all those news radios, etc. For the first time in Star history, nobody would be in the newsroom overnight. We’d be relying on some outside agency to perform the critical service of identifying and even covering breaking local news — our proverbial bread ‘n’ butter, the core of our Toronto Star brand. All to save some portion of the radio room’s annual $250,000 cost.

We have a better idea, and have today formally proposed it to the company. We propose to create, in bargaining, a new student radio room rate, much cheaper than the existing trainee rate used to pay both radio roomers and interns. It would see the radio roomers, who are all full-time journalism students, continue to earn roughly $20 an hour to work temp shifts. The company will get significant savings but the newsroom’s critical needs will be protected.

We are encouraged at the company’s early positive response to this proposal. We’re confident the radio room will be saved. We think this is a very good thing for the paper, our newsroom, and the ability of the Star to maintain its critical brand in Toronto. And we hope the company’s most senior officials will see similar bottom-line benefits in our other emerging ideas to save other critical jobs at our paper, including continued ownership of its own page production.

— Stuart Laidlaw, Star unit chair, and your Guild stewards and bargaining committee


Reporters are pretty terrible at keeping records – I know it’s not just me. Go ahead and ask one to hand over the report they wrote a story about last June. I’ll wait here for a while as they frantically check sent folders and try to remember where on their hard drive they may have placed the thing.

So I’ve started using Evernote, which is a computer program (and corresponding app) that lets you save things on remote servers and access from whichever device you are using. I know that sounds like the most boring thing about journalism ever, but it’s actually made a huge difference in my job and I’ve only been using it for a week.

So here are six reasons why I’m using the program, in what might be the world’s most boring journalism-related blog post of all time.

Many computers

So on any given day I may work on my basement desktop, laptop, work desktop, iPhone and/or iPad. Any files I create end up on those hard drives and it can be a pain to find them. I try to keep on top of it by creating story folders in Dropbox and saving things to them, but it’s laborious and easy to forget. Evernote looks the same on every computer I use and the apps are synched, so it’s a mindless way to put files in one place.


I find e-mail the biggest pain in the ass of all. Especially attachments. Do you keep them? Save them in a folder on a hard drive? I never figured it out. Evernote gives each account a unique e-mail so you can just fling things into folders from your client (it even adds a button in Outlook to save you the trouble of actually forwarding).

Text files

Here’s where it’s different than DropBox – it has a good text editor. So now, I’m taking notes as I do interviews right inside of Evernote. I create a folder for a story and then type away. I’m not creating Word files and then saving them in the cloud, I’m actually working on them in the cloud. I know this is boring, and maybe obvious, but starting in Evernote means I’ll remember to save there too.


While Dropbox lets me dump everything somewhere, Evernote actually shows me what I have in a folder. So if I save a story-related PDF into a folder, it shows up as a PDF. Pictures are pictures. And you can play audio files from within the program.. This saves the open-close-open-close searching that I sometimes have to do to find information in a bunch of documents that all have similar names.


Bookmarking stuff on the Internet is fine and all and I know you can make them fairly portable, but by clicking one button in Chrome I can save stuff directly into Evernote folders. This is a surprisingly handy way to get screen shots, save recipes and other content heavy stuff you might want when you’re out shopping or whatever, and having records of important things you’ve found online that may never ever be useful again (but just might be worth saving anyway).


But that’s nothing – the most important feature (and this is part of the $50 premium package) is that you can search documents. So all I need to do is type in a keyword and every document that contains that word is listed. Anyone with a pile of Word docs and a stack of PDFs should drool at the prospect of a fully-indexed archive of materials.